• Title of article

    Cross-Sectional Computed Tomographic Assessment Improves Accuracy of Aortic Annular Sizing for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Reduces the Incidence of Paravalvular Aortic Regurgitation

  • Author/Authors

    Hasan Jilaihawi، نويسنده , , Hasan and Kashif، نويسنده , , Mohammad and Fontana، نويسنده , , Gregory and Furugen، نويسنده , , Azusa and Shiota، نويسنده , , Takahiro and Friede، نويسنده , , Gerald and Makhija، نويسنده , , Rakhee and Doctor، نويسنده , , Niraj and Leon، نويسنده , , Martin B. and Makkar، نويسنده , , Raj R.، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2012
  • Pages
    12
  • From page
    1275
  • To page
    1286
  • Abstract
    Objectives effort to define the gold standard for annular sizing for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), we sought to critically analyze and compare the predictive value of multiple measures of the aortic annulus for post-TAVR paravalvular (PV) regurgitation and then assess the impact of a novel cross-sectional computed tomographic (CT) approach to annular sizing. ound studies have shown clear discrepancies between conventional 2-dimensional (2D) echocardiographic and CT measurements. In terms of aortic annular measurement for TAVR, such findings have lacked the outcome analysis required to inform clinical practice. s scriminatory value of multiple CT annular measures for post-TAVR PV aortic regurgitation was compared with 2D echocardiographic measures. TAVR outcomes with device selection according to aortic annular sizing using a traditional 2D transesophageal echocardiography–guided or a novel CT-guided approach were also studied. s eiver-operating characteristic models, cross-sectional CT parameters had the highest discriminatory value for post-TAVR PV regurgitation: This was with the area under the curve for [maximal cross-sectional diameter minus prosthesis size] of 0.82 (95% confidence interval: 0.69 to 0.94; p < 0.001) and that for [circumference-derived cross-sectional diameter minus prosthesis size] of 0.81 (95% confidence interval: 0.7 to 0.94; p < 0.001). In contrast, traditional echocardiographic measures were nondiscriminatory in relation to post-TAVR PV aortic regurgitation. The prospective application of a CT-guided annular sizing approach resulted in less PV aortic regurgitation of grade worse than mild after TAVR (7.5% vs. 21.9%; p = 0.045). sions ta lend strong support to 3-dimensional cross-sectional measures, using CT as the new gold standard for aortic annular evaluation for TAVR with the Edwards SAPIEN device.
  • Keywords
    paravalvular aortic regurgitation , transcatheter aortic valve implantation , transcatheter aortic valve replacement , aortic annulus , computed tomography , Aortic stenosis
  • Journal title
    JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
  • Serial Year
    2012
  • Journal title
    JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
  • Record number

    1753776