Title of article :
Normal Saline Versus Hypertonic 3% Saline: It’s Efficacy in Non-Acute Rhinosinusitis
Author/Authors :
Berjis, Nezamoddin Department of otorhinolaryngology - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences - Isfahan - Iran , Sonbolastan, Mehdi Department of otorhinolaryngology - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences - Isfahan - Iran , Okhovat, Hanif Department of otorhinolaryngology - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences - Isfahan - Iran , Narimani, Ali Asghar Department of otorhinolaryngology - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences - Isfahan - Iran , Razmjui, Jaleh General physician - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences - Isfahan - Iran
Pages :
6
From page :
23
To page :
28
Abstract :
Introduction: Sinusitis is one of the most common diseases in general and in otolaryngology practice, but the optimal therapeutic options have not yet been fully developed. This manuscript will try to compare normal saline nasal douching with hypertonic saline in reducing symptoms and improving its signs. Materials and Methods: One hundred and fourteen patients suffering from non acute rhinosinusitis, documented by history, physical examination and radiologic studies were divided into normal saline and hypertonic saline groups, each consisting of 57 patients. data were obtained by physical examination and a questionnaire.. Results: Type of treatment had no significant effect on headache, morning dryness of mouth and pharynx and fatigue. Nontheless, nasal congestion, purulent discharge and postnasal discharge were reported to have improved in the group treated with hypertonic saline versus the normal saline group. Patient satisfaction also showed better scores in the hypertonic saline group. Conclusion: Hypertonic saline (3%) is more effective for nasal irrigation than normal saline in chronic rhinosinusitis.
Keywords :
Chronic rhinosinusitis , Hypertonic saline , Postnasal discharge
Journal title :
Astroparticle Physics
Serial Year :
2011
Record number :
2425088
Link To Document :
بازگشت