Title of article :
Memantine Treatment in Acute Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Author/Authors :
Riazi Esfahani, Mohammad Eye Research Center - Farabi Eye Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Aalami Harandi, Zahra Eye Research Center - Farabi Eye Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Kiumehr, Saman Eye Research Center - Farabi Eye Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Gholmi, Afsaneh Eye Research Center - Farabi Eye Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Tabasi, Abdolreza Eye Research Center - Farabi Eye Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Piri, Niloofar Eye Research Center - Farabi Eye Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Mirshahi, Ahmad Eye Research Center - Farabi Eye Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Nili Ahmadabadi, Mehdi Eye Research Center - Farabi Eye Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Movassat, Morteza Eye Research Center - Farabi Eye Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Fakhraee, Ghasem Eye Research Center - Farabi Eye Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Abstract :
Purpose: To evaluate the effects of memantine on improving visual function in patients with acute nonarteritic
anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION)
Methods: This was a prospective, double masked, randomized, clinical trial. The study involved 47 subjects
with unilateral NAION of less than 8 weeks duration. Eligible patients were randomly allocated to take either
memantine tablets (5 mg daily during the first week and then 10 mg daily for the next two weeks, 25
subjects) or placebo tablets (22 subjects). Baseline visual acuity (VA) tests, pattern visual evoked potential
(VEP) and automated perimetry (SITA-standard 24-2) were performed. VA tests were repeated 3 weeks, 3
months and 6 months after initial visit. VEP and automated perimetry were repeated 3 months after initial
visit.
Results: At baseline there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of clinical and
laboratory characteristics. After 3 weeks, 3 months and 6 months of treatment, best corrected visual acuity
(BCVA) improved by -0.31±0.39, -0.49±0.47 and -0.53±0.48 logMAR in the memantine group respectively
and -0.02±0.41, -0.09±0.60 and -0.05±0.67 logMAR in the placebo group respectively (P=0.024, P=0.025
and P=0.017). VEP results demonstrated a reduction of implicit time of -8.32±17.18 ms in the memantine
group after 3 months, whereas in the placebo group it increased +5.7±21.60 ms (P=0.043). The change in
VEP amplitude was not significantly different between the memantine and placebo groups (P=0.083). The
effect of the memantine on mean deviation (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD) changes was not
significantly different from that of the placebo (P=0.428 and 0.863 respectively).
Conclusion: Treatment of patients who experience acute NAION with memantine may result in significant
improvement in BCVA compared with no treatment. The VEP changes seen at 3 months may indicate
improved transmission of impulses through the optic nerve.
Keywords :
Visual Evoked Potential , Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy , Memantine , Automated Perimetry
Journal title :
Astroparticle Physics