Author/Authors :
Lashgari, Ali Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Kabiri, Majid Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Ramezani, Alireza Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Entezari, Morteza Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Karimi, Saeed Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Kakaei, Sajad Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Yaseri, Mehdi Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Nikkhah, Homayoun Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
Abstract :
Purpose: To determine the prognostic factors and visual and anatomic outcomes of pars plana
vitrectomy (PPV) in patients with dropped nucleus following complicated phacoemulsification (PE).
Methods: The records of patients with complicated PE who underwent PPV to remove posteriorly dislocated
nucleus fragments from January 2011 to December 2014 were retrospectively reviewed.
Results: Of 43 patients, 36 patients (36 eyes) were included with mean age of 73 ± 9.5 years and mean
follow‑up duration of 23.8 ± 15.3 (range 4–53) months. The mean interval between cataract surgery and PPV
was 11.5 ± 9.6 (range 1–45) days. The pre‑PPV mean best‑corrected visual acuity (VA) was 1.04 ± 0.24 logMAR,
which improved to 0.46 ± 0.18 logMAR (P < 0.001). Pre‑PPV VA ≥20/200 was significantly associated
with good final VA ≥20/40 (P = 0.002). Implantation of intraocular lens (IOL) at the time of complicated
PE and complicated course after PPV were significantly associated with poor visual outcome of <20/40
(P = 0.041 and P < 0.001, respectively). However, the timing of PPV, route of nucleus removal, and final IOL
status were not significantly associated with the visual outcome. The most frequent causes of poor visual
outcome were optic atrophy, cystoid and/or diabetic macular edema, history of rhegmatogenous retinal
detachment, and pre‑existing eye disease (age‑related macular degeneration).
Conclusion: PPV for dropped nucleus was associated with improved VA. Better pre‑PPV VA was associated
with good visual outcome, while inserting IOL at the time of complicated PE, and complicated course after
PPV were associated with poor visual outcome.
Keywords :
Dropped Nucleus , Phacoemulsification , Pars Plana Vitrectomy , Visual Outcome