Author/Authors :
Faiz, Hamid Reza Rasool Akarm Hospital - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Ira , Rahimzadeh, Poupak Rasool Akarm Hospital - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Ira , Ziyaeifard, Mohsen Rajaie Cardiovascular, Medical, and Research Center - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran , Hassani, Valiollah Rasool Akarm Hospital - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Ira , Ghodrati, Mohamad Reza Rasool Akarm Hospital - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Ira , Heshmati, Bijan Rasool Akarm Hospital - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Ira , Tarahomi, Mohammad Rajaie Cardiovascular, Medical, and Research Center - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
Abstract :
Background: The cannulation of the internal jugular vein is done to access the central vein for
hemodynamic monitoring and other purposes. A safe internal cannulation of the jugular vein is
performed using anatomical landmarks on the surface of the skin or using the ultrasound-guided
method. In this study, we compared the ultrasound-guided technique and the anatomical
landmark method for the internal insertion of the jugular vein catheter by anesthesia residents
on adult patients in terms of the rates of their success rate and complications.
Methods: In this study, 90 patients were divided into 2 equal groups. The anatomical landmark
technique was used in the first group and ultrasound guidance in the second group to cannulate
the internal jugular vein. In both methods, the number of attempts, the rate of failure, the rate of
carotid rupture, and the rate of complications such as pneumothorax, hematoma, and
arrhythmias were documented.
Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups vis-à-vis the number of
the attempts to catheterize each patient (P=0.352). Cannulation failure was reported in only 1
patient in each group, and there was no significant difference between the 2 groups (P=0.062).
The results demonstrated no significant difference between the groups (P=0.750) concerning
the rate of complications of the internal jugular vein catheterization.
Conclusions: Neither of the methods of ultrasound guidance and anatomical landmarks had a
significant superiority in terms of the success rate and the complications of the insertion of the
internal jugular vein catheter. The reason for the absence of a significant difference between the
2 groups in the above parameters was the anesthesia residents’ insufficient personal skills in
performing ultrasound.