Title of article :
Does meta-cognitive theory enhance our understanding of pathological worry and anxiety?
Author/Authors :
Robert N. Davis، نويسنده , , David P. Valentiner، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2000
Abstract :
This study tests several tenets of Wells’ meta-cognitive theory of Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD) by using the Meta-Cognitions Questionnaire (MCQ), which was designed to measure meta-cognition in GAD. The MCQ Cognitive Confidence subscale (MCQ-CC) predicted anxiety symptoms even after controlling for both trait anxiety and trait worry. In addition, the MCQ Uncontrollability and Danger (MCQ-UD) subscale had the highest correlation with a discriminant function that correctly classified 80.6% of nonanxious, nonworried-anxious, and GAD participants. Finally, participants who met GAD criteria exhibited significantly higher levels of meta-worry than nonanxious and nonworried-anxious participants, and exhibited both positive and negative beliefs about worry. These results offer additional support for Wells’ meta-cognitive theory of GAD, but also highlight some of its limitations with respect to predictive validity.
Keywords :
Trait anxiety , Worry beliefs , Generalised anxiety disorder , Meta-cognition , Worry , anxiety symptoms
Journal title :
Personality and Individual Differences
Journal title :
Personality and Individual Differences