Title of article :
Invisible hand? More like post-modern mush
Author/Authors :
DIXON، JENNIFER نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2009
Pages :
6
From page :
503
To page :
508
Abstract :
Some time around 2001, new Labour crossed an ideological rubicon by accepting that provider competition and patient choice were valuable to prod the National Health Service (NHS) towards better performance. Exactly what produced this ideological volte face by the then Secretary of State, Alan Milburn (and presumably some time earlier by the Prime Minister), has never been made clear. It may have been as simple as the fact that all other levers had been tried to reduce waiting times for elective treatments without enough effect. Or that extra supply of beds and staff were needed overnight to make progress, and the only source of these was outside of the NHS. Most likely it was both reasons. But no dressing up the need for extra supply or the desire to give more patients choice could hide the raw verdict that competition for resources between institutions – external threat – was a helpful motivator for the staff within them, including even the holiest of men and women in the NHS, the clinical staff. In making this verdict, new Labour had accepted what had been concluded by the Conservatives over ten years previously, which culminated in the policy of the White Paper, Working for Patients, in 1990, and the implementation of the NHS internal market in 1991.
Journal title :
Health Economics, Policy and Law
Serial Year :
2009
Journal title :
Health Economics, Policy and Law
Record number :
651119
Link To Document :
بازگشت