Title of article :
Single-Agent Therapy for Low Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia (LRGTN): A Preliminary Report on a Randomized Clinical Trial to Compare Pulse-Methotrexate versus Pulse-Dactinomycin
Author/Authors :
ZAHRA EFTEKHAR، نويسنده , , PARVANEH RAHIMI MOGHADDAM، نويسنده , , FARIDEH DEHDAR DARGAHI and FARIBA YARANDI، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
فصلنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2004
Pages :
4
From page :
41
To page :
44
Abstract :
The efficacy of single-agent chemotherapy for patients with low risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (LRGTN) with methotrexate or dactinomycin is well established, but efforts continue to reduce the toxicity, the patients’ time and cost of treatment. In a randomized clinical trial, we evaluated and compared the efficacy, toxicity and cost effectiveness of pulse-methotrexate versus pulse-dactinomycin as single-agent therapy in LRGTN. Forty low risk GTN patients were randomly assigned to receive pulse-methotrexate (30 mg/m2 weekly intramuscularly) (20 cases) or pulse-dactinomycin (1.25 mg/m2 every two weeks intra-muscularly) (20 cases). Treatment continued if no major toxicity was encountered and beta human chori-onic gonadotropin (β-hCG) values were lower than 5mIU/m2 in three consecutive weeks. Seventy percent of methotrexate group and 90% of dactinomycin group responded to treatment (100% remission was achieved with no recurrence in one-year follow-up). The mean time to response was 43 days for meth-otrexate and 66 days for dactinomycin group (P-value = 0.001). Patients achieved remission after receiv-ing an average of 8 courses of therapy in methotrexate versus 6 courses in dactinomycin group (P-value = 0.002). The average cost of treatment per course was about 7 US$ for methotrexate and 62 US$ for dactinomycin group (P-value < 0.001). There were no cases of major toxicity in methotrexate or dactino-mycin groups. Overall, both methotrexate and dactinomycin were associated with good remission rate. Based on our results, LRGTN treatment with dactinomycin is somewhat more effective than that with methotrexate, but methotrexate is more cost-effective for both patients and the health system. As the ef-fectiveness of both pulse-methotrexate and pulse-dactinomycin does not differ significantly, pulse-dactinomycin is recommended as first-line treatment.
Keywords :
gestational trophoblastic neoplasia , Single-agent chemotherapy , Dactinomycin , methotrexate
Journal title :
Iranian Journal of Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Serial Year :
2004
Journal title :
Iranian Journal of Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Record number :
657847
Link To Document :
بازگشت