Title of article :
Real-time paramedic compared with blinded physician identification of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of an observational study
Author/Authors :
James A. Feldman، نويسنده , , Kathryn Brinsfield، نويسنده , , Sheilah Bernard، نويسنده , , Daniel White، نويسنده , , Thomas Maciejko، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2005
Pages :
6
From page :
443
To page :
448
Abstract :
The aim of the study were to determine if paramedics can accurately identify ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) on prehospital 12-lead (PHTL) electrocardiogram and to compare paramedic with blinded physician identification of STEMI. Paramedics identified definite STEMI, or possible acute myocardial infarction but not definite, and nondiagnostic. Two blinded readers (cardiologist and emergency physician) independently categorized each PHTL. A third reviewer assigned final diagnoses and determined whether the PHTL met STEMI criteria. One hundred sixty-six PHTL were acquired over an 8-month period. Fifteen were excluded from analysis. Sixty-two percent of the patients (94/151) were male, mean age was 61.1 years (±14.8 SD, range 20-92 years), and 81% had chest pain. Twenty-five patients (16.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 11%-23.5%) had confirmed STEMI and 16 (10.6%) had confirmed non-STEMI acute myocardial infarction. Paramedic sensitivity was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.64-0.96); specificity was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.94-1.00) with positive likelihood ratio of 25.2 and negative likelihood ratio of 0.21. Overall accuracy was similar for paramedic and physician reviewers (0.94, 0.93, 0.95). Highly trained paramedics in an urban emergency medical services system can identify patients with STEMI as accurately as blinded physician reviewers.
Journal title :
American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Serial Year :
2005
Journal title :
American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Record number :
780721
Link To Document :
بازگشت