Title of article :
Metamodels for variable importance decomposition with applications
to probabilistic engineering design
Author/Authors :
Hemalatha Sathyanarayanamurthy a، نويسنده , , 1، نويسنده , , Ratna Babu Chinnam، نويسنده , , *، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
ماهنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2009
Abstract :
It is routine in probabilistic engineering design to conduct modeling studies to determine the influence of
an input variable (or a combination) on the output variable(s). The output or the response can then be
fine-tuned by changing the design parameters based on this information. However, simply fine-tuning
the output to the desired or target value is not adequate. Robust design principles suggest that we not
only study the mean response for a given input vector but also the variance in the output attributed to
noise and other unaccounted factors. Given our desire to reduce variability in any process, it is also
important to understand which of the input factors affect the variability in the output the most. Given
the significant computational overhead associated with most Computer Aided Engineering models, it is
becoming popular to conduct such analysis through surrogate models built using a variety of metamodeling
techniques. In this regard, existing literature on metamodeling and sensitivity analysis techniques
provides useful insights into the various scenarios that they suit the best. However, there has been a limitation
of studies that simultaneously consider the combination of metamodeling and sensitivity analysis
and the environments in which they operate the best. This paper aims at contributing to reduce this limitation
by basing the study on multiple metrics and using two test problems. Two test functions have
been used to build metamodels, using three popular metamodeling techniques: Kriging, Radial-Basis
Function (RBF) networks, and Support Vector Machines (SVMs). The metamodels are then used for sensitivity
analysis, using two popular sensitivity analysis methods, Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test
(FAST) and Sobol, to determine the influence of variance in the input variables on the variance of the output
variables. The advantages and disadvantages of the different metamodeling techniques, in combination
with the sensitivity analysis methods, in determining the extent to which the variabilities in the
input affect the variabilities in the output are analyzed.
Keywords :
Probabilistic engineering design , Metamodels , Sensitivity analysis , FAST , Kriging , Sobol
Journal title :
Computers & Industrial Engineering
Journal title :
Computers & Industrial Engineering