پديد آورندگان :
Rasoulian Maryam نويسنده , Taghva Arsia نويسنده , Salehi Mansour نويسنده , Ghalebandi Mir Farhad نويسنده , Panaghi Laily نويسنده , Zahiraldin Alireza نويسنده
چكيده لاتين :
In Aug 2004, for the first time, a psychiatric OSCE was piloted in Iran. The objective of current
study was to explore the view and opinion of both candidates and examiners after they took part in the exam.
Methods: Two focus groups were formed. There were 10 participants in each group. Each group was asked
to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the OSCE. The discussion was tape recorded and then converted
into a script before being analyzed.
Results: Standard format of the exam and its unbiased evaluation of candidates’ abilities were reported as the
most significant advantages of OSCE. However, participants criticized the artificiality of the setting and use of
simulated patients.
Conclusion: Although expensive and time consuming to organize, OSCE was viewed as a standard and fair
method of assessing candidates’ skills. To overcome the artificiality of the setting, participants asked for a better
training of the actors and actresses.
Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (IJPBS) , Volume 1, Number 1, Spring and Summer 2007 : 27-29 .