تجاوز حدود الدفاع الشرعي في قانون العقوبات الجزائري

Most modern legal legislations recognize legitimate defense as one of the reasons for permissibility to respond to an attack, if some of the necessary conditions that must be met in the act of assault are fulfilled in order for the victim to have the right to respond, and the act of defense in itself must be a necessary commensurate with the assault. an‎d if the defender exceeds the limits of legitimate defense, his act goes out of the scope of permissibility to return to its origin within the circle of criminalization. In the absence of a text for the provisions of override in Algerian legislation, as is the case in Egyptian law, the general rules are applied in this regard. If the transgression was willful, the act of the transgressor (the abused) shall be considered an intentional crime, and if the transgression was in good faith as a result of lack of precaution or negligence, the trespasser shall be asked about an unintentional offense if there is a criminal description of it as a result of the fault; or no accountability occurs when there is no error due to the inability to estimate the circumstances. But if the transgression is based on an error in the permissibility, the transgressor is not asked to eliminate the error on the basis that the reasons for legitimate defense are objective.