Author/Authors :
Fisher، نويسنده , , Janet A. and Brown، نويسنده , , Katrina، نويسنده ,
DocumentNumber :
3543524
Title Of Article :
Ecosystem services concepts and approaches in conservation: Just a rhetorical tool?
شماره ركورد :
2594
Latin Abstract :
Many commentators have raised questions about the recent focus on ecosystem services (ES) concepts in conservation, but little empirical analysis exists. We present a novel empirical analysis using interviews and Q Methodology to examine how conservation practitioners and organisations are interpreting and using ES concepts and associated approaches. We find that these concepts are being adopted for instrumental imperatives to broaden constituencies and with an expectation of extending funding sources. We uncover concerns within conservation that the utilitarian emphases of ES concepts may compromise the ability to make non-utilitarian arguments for nature in the future. In relation to changing practice, we examine shifts in partnerships and funding, where ES ideas provide a shared language about flows of value, apparently accelerating the integration of conservation and the private sector. Whilst many respondents noted the significance of shifts related to ES ideas, some attempted to play these down, presenting their organisationʹs adoption of these ideas as ‘just a rhetorical tool’. However, we argue that the adoption of ES concepts cannot be presented as solely rhetorical, given that these increasingly underpin and inform planning tools and policy instruments.
From Page :
257
NaturalLanguageKeyword :
Q methodology , International conservation organisations , biodiversity , Payments for ecosystem services
JournalTitle :
Studia Iranica
To Page :
265
To Page :
265
Link To Document :
بازگشت