Author/Authors
Ito، نويسنده , , Nobuyuki and Takeuchi، نويسنده , , Kenji and Kuriyama، نويسنده , , Koichi and Shoji، نويسنده , , Yasushi and Tsuge، نويسنده , , Takahiro and Mitani، نويسنده , , Yohei، نويسنده ,
DocumentNumber
3539871
Title Of Article
The influence of decision-making rules on individual preferences for ecological restoration: Evidence from an experimental survey
شماره ركورد
2972
Latin Abstract
We conduct an experimental survey to analyze how rules for collective decision-making influence individual preferences regarding nature restoration plans. Our study compares two decision-making rules—a consensus rule and a majority rule—wherein participants decide on a plan regarding nature restoration in the Kushiro Wetland, Japan. Our main finding is that the difference between the individual preferences and collective decision-making is less significant under the consensus rule than the majority rule. Furthermore, there is a larger disparity with regard to the marginal willingness to pay between collective and individual decisions when participants are unsatisfied with the results of collective choice.
From Page
2426
NaturalLanguageKeyword
Participatory approaches , Stated preference , Decision-making rules , Environmental valuation , Ecological restoration
JournalTitle
Studia Iranica
To Page
2431
To Page
2431
Link To Document