DocumentCode
1101489
Title
MIMO radar: Snake oil or good idea?
Author
Daum, Fred ; Huang, Jim
Author_Institution
Raytheon, Woburn, MA, USA
Volume
24
Issue
5
fYear
2009
fDate
5/1/2009 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage
8
Lastpage
12
Abstract
MIMO communication is theoretically superior to conventional communication under certain conditions, and MIMO communication also appears to be practical and cost-effective in the real world for some applications. It is natural to suppose that the same is true for MIMO radar, but the situation is not so clear. Researchers claim many advantages of MIMO radar relative to phased array radars (e.g., better detection performance, better angular resolution, better angular measurement accuracy, improved robustness against RFI, ECM, multipath, etc.). We will evaluate such assertions from a system engineering viewpoint. In particular, there are serious trade-offs of MIMO vs. phased array radars relative to cost, system complexity, and risk considering numerous real world effects that are not included in most theoretical analyses. Moreover, in many cases one can achieve essentially the same radar system improvement with phased array radars using simpler, less expensive, and less risky algorithms. We evaluate roughly a dozen asserted advantages of MIMO radar relative to phased arrays.
Keywords
MIMO communication; angular measurement; phased array radar; risk analysis; MIMO communication; MIMO phased array radar; angular measurement resolution; radar system risky algorithm; system engineering viewpoint; Electronic countermeasures; MIMO; Petroleum; Phase detection; Phase measurement; Phased arrays; Radar detection; Radar measurements; Radiofrequency interference; Robustness;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, IEEE
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0885-8985
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/MAES.2009.5109947
Filename
5109947
Link To Document