• DocumentCode
    1101489
  • Title

    MIMO radar: Snake oil or good idea?

  • Author

    Daum, Fred ; Huang, Jim

  • Author_Institution
    Raytheon, Woburn, MA, USA
  • Volume
    24
  • Issue
    5
  • fYear
    2009
  • fDate
    5/1/2009 12:00:00 AM
  • Firstpage
    8
  • Lastpage
    12
  • Abstract
    MIMO communication is theoretically superior to conventional communication under certain conditions, and MIMO communication also appears to be practical and cost-effective in the real world for some applications. It is natural to suppose that the same is true for MIMO radar, but the situation is not so clear. Researchers claim many advantages of MIMO radar relative to phased array radars (e.g., better detection performance, better angular resolution, better angular measurement accuracy, improved robustness against RFI, ECM, multipath, etc.). We will evaluate such assertions from a system engineering viewpoint. In particular, there are serious trade-offs of MIMO vs. phased array radars relative to cost, system complexity, and risk considering numerous real world effects that are not included in most theoretical analyses. Moreover, in many cases one can achieve essentially the same radar system improvement with phased array radars using simpler, less expensive, and less risky algorithms. We evaluate roughly a dozen asserted advantages of MIMO radar relative to phased arrays.
  • Keywords
    MIMO communication; angular measurement; phased array radar; risk analysis; MIMO communication; MIMO phased array radar; angular measurement resolution; radar system risky algorithm; system engineering viewpoint; Electronic countermeasures; MIMO; Petroleum; Phase detection; Phase measurement; Phased arrays; Radar detection; Radar measurements; Radiofrequency interference; Robustness;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, IEEE
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0885-8985
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/MAES.2009.5109947
  • Filename
    5109947