• DocumentCode
    1161876
  • Title

    Effects of numerical formulation on magnetic field computation using meshless methods

  • Author

    Lee, Kok-Meng ; Li, Qiang ; Sun, Hungson

  • Author_Institution
    George W. Woodruff Sch. of Mech. Eng., Georgia Inst. of Technol., Atlanta, GA
  • Volume
    42
  • Issue
    9
  • fYear
    2006
  • Firstpage
    2164
  • Lastpage
    2171
  • Abstract
    Meshless methods have some advantages over their counterparts such as the finite-element method (FEM). However, existing meshless methods for computational electromagnetic fields are still not as efficient as FEM. In this paper, we compare two meshless methods of discretizing the computational domain of Poisson-like problems; namely, the point collocation and Galerkin methods (which use the strong and weak forms of the governing equation respectively), and their effects on the computational accuracy and efficiency of the magnetic fields. We also discuss methods of handling discontinuities at the material interface. We present several examples, which also provide a means to validate and evaluate both meshless methods. Exact solutions and/or FEM are used as a basis for comparison. In addition, we also verify the results by comparing computed magnetic forces against those measured experimentally
  • Keywords
    Galerkin method; finite element analysis; magnetic fields; Galerkin methods; Poisson-like problems; element free; finite element; magnetic field computation; material interface discontinuities; meshless methods; point collocation; strong form formulation; weak form formulation; Boundary conditions; Equations; Finite difference methods; Finite element methods; Interpolation; Magnetic field measurement; Magnetic fields; Magnetic materials; Moment methods; Shape; Element free; Galerkin methods; finite element; magnetic field; meshless method; strong form; weak form formulation;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0018-9464
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TMAG.2006.880401
  • Filename
    1678059