Title :
Using criteria in the recommendation report: a case study of the Texas A&M university bonfire commission findings
Author_Institution :
Dept. of English, Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK, USA
Abstract :
This case study describes classroom use of the decision making criteria contained in a recommendation report for corrective action following the 1999 bonfire accident at Texas A&M University, in which 12 students were killed and 27 were injured during a school-sanctioned activity. The instructional framework introduces criteria as a decision making tool, asks undergraduates to apply simple criteria in a hypothetical situation, outlines the TAMU case, and analyzes the TAMU report´s criteria item by item. It also provides guidelines for assessing students´ integration of criteria into their own recommendation reports. This case study offers an analytical model not often available to readers outside an organization and introduces undergraduates to a more sophisticated evaluative methodology than most have used in previous writing projects.
Keywords :
decision making; educational institutions; professional communication; Texas A&M University Bonfire Commission finding; analytical reports; case study; decision making; evaluative method; institutional communication; recommendation reports; school-sanctioned activity; Accidents; Analytical models; Computer aided software engineering; Decision making; Educational institutions; Employment; Guidelines; Professional communication; Testing; Writing; Analytical reports; case studies; decision making criteria; evaluative methods; institutional communication; recommendation reports;
Journal_Title :
Professional Communication, IEEE Transactions on
DOI :
10.1109/TPC.2004.837978