DocumentCode
1201403
Title
Wavelength converter placement under different RWA algorithms in wavelength-routed all-optical networks
Author
Chu, Xiaowen ; Li, Bo ; Chlamtac, Imrich
Author_Institution
Dept. of Comput. Sci., Hong Kong Univ. of Sci. & Technol., China
Volume
51
Issue
4
fYear
2003
fDate
4/1/2003 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage
607
Lastpage
617
Abstract
Sparse wavelength conversion and appropriate routing and wavelength assignment (RWA) algorithms are the two key factors in improving the blocking performance in wavelength-routed all-optical networks. It has been shown that the optimal placement of a limited number of wavelength converters in an arbitrary mesh network is an NP-complete problem. There have been various heuristic algorithms proposed in the literature, in which most of them assume that a static routing and random-wavelength assignment RWA algorithm is employed. However, the existing work shows that fixed-alternate routing and dynamic routing RWA algorithms can achieve much better blocking performance. Our study further demonstrates that the wavelength converter placement and RWA algorithms are closely related in the sense that a well-designed wavelength converter placement mechanism for a particular RWA algorithm might not work well with a different RWA algorithm. Therefore, the wavelength converter placement and the RWA have to be considered jointly. The objective of this paper is to investigate the wavelength converter placement problem under the fixed-alternate routing (FAR) algorithm and least-loaded routing (LLR) algorithm. Under the FAR algorithm, we propose a heuristic algorithm called minimum blocking probability first for wavelength converter placement. Under the LLR algorithm, we propose another heuristic algorithm called weighted maximum segment length. The objective of the converter placement algorithms is to minimize the overall blocking probability. Extensive simulation studies have been carried out over three typical mesh networks, including the 14-node NSFNET, 19-node EON, and 38-node CTNET. We observe that the proposed algorithms not only outperform existing wavelength converter placement algorithms by a large margin, but they also can achieve almost the same performance compared with full wavelength conversion under the same RWA algorithm.
Keywords
computational complexity; network topology; optical fibre networks; optical wavelength conversion; probability; telecommunication network routing; wavelength division multiplexing; CTNET; EON; FAR algorithm; NP-complete problem; NSFNET; WDM; blocking performance; blocking probability; dynamic routing RWA algorithms; fixed-alternate routing; fixed-alternate routing algorithm; heuristic algorithm; least-loaded routing algorithm; mesh network; minimum blocking probability first; network nodes; optimal placement; random-wavelength assignment RWA algorithm; routing and wavelength assignment algorithms; simulation; sparse wavelength conversion; static routing; wavelength converter placement; wavelength-division multiplexing; wavelength-routed all-optical networks; weighted maximum segment length algorithm; All-optical networks; Computer science; Heuristic algorithms; Intelligent networks; Mesh networks; Optical fiber networks; Optical wavelength conversion; Wavelength assignment; Wavelength division multiplexing; Wavelength routing;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Communications, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0090-6778
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/TCOMM.2003.810834
Filename
1199286
Link To Document