DocumentCode :
1288117
Title :
Attenuation correction strategies for multi-energy photon emitters using SPECT
Author :
Pretorius, P.H. ; King, M.A. ; Pan, T.-S. ; Hutton, B.F.
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Nucl. Med., Massachusetts Univ. Med. Center, Worcester, MA, USA
Volume :
44
Issue :
3
fYear :
1997
fDate :
6/1/1997 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage :
1323
Lastpage :
1328
Abstract :
The aim of this study was to investigate whether the photopeak window projections from different energy photons can be combined into a single window for reconstruction or if it is better to not combine the projections due to differences in the attenuation maps required for each photon energy. The mathematical cardiac torso (MCAT) phantom was modified to simulate the uptake of Ga-67 in the human body. Four spherical hot tumors were placed in locations which challenged attenuation correction. An analytical 3D projector with attenuation and detector response included was used to generate projection sets. Data were reconstructed using filtered backprojection (FBP) reconstruction with Butterworth filtering in conjunction with one iteration of Chang attenuation correction, and with 5 and 10 iterations of ordered-subset maximum-likelihood expectation maximization (ML-OS) reconstruction. To serve as a standard for comparison, the projection sets obtained from the two energies were first reconstructed separately using their own attenuation maps. The emission data obtained from both energies were added and reconstructed using the following attenuation strategies: 1) the 93 keV attenuation map for attenuation correction, 2) the 185 keV attenuation map for attenuation correction, 3) using a weighted mean obtained from combining the 93 keV and 185 keV maps, and 4) an ordered subset approach which combines both energies. The central count ratio (CCR) and total count ratio (TCR) were used to compare the performance of the different strategies. Compared to the standard method, results indicate an over-estimation with strategy 1, an under-estimation with strategy 2 and comparable results with strategies 3 and 4. In all strategies, the CCRs of sphere 4 (in proximity to the liver, spleen and backbone) were under-estimated, although TCRs were comparable to that of the other locations. The weighted mean and ordered subset strategies for attenuation correction were of comparable accuracy to reconstruction of the windows separately. They are recommended for multi-energy photon SPECT imaging quantitation when there is a need to combine the acquisitions of multiple windows
Keywords :
Butterworth filters; cardiology; filtering theory; image reconstruction; iterative methods; maximum likelihood estimation; medical image processing; single photon emission computed tomography; 185 keV; 93 keV; 67Ga uptake; Butterworth filtering; Chang attenuation correction; Ga; SPECT; analytical 3D projector; attenuation correction strategies; backbone; central count ratio; detector response; filtered backprojection reconstruction; iteration; liver; mathematical cardiac torso phantom; multi-energy photon SPECT imaging quantitation; multi-energy photon emitters; multiple windows; ordered-subset maximum-likelihood expectation maximization; photopeak window projections; projection sets; reconstruction; spherical hot tumors; spleen; total count ratio; Attenuation; Biological system modeling; Detectors; Filtering; Humans; Image reconstruction; Imaging phantoms; Maximum likelihood detection; Neoplasms; Torso;
fLanguage :
English
Journal_Title :
Nuclear Science, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher :
ieee
ISSN :
0018-9499
Type :
jour
DOI :
10.1109/23.597008
Filename :
597008
Link To Document :
بازگشت