• DocumentCode
    1364481
  • Title

    Noise characteristics of 3-D and 2-D PET images

  • Author

    Pajevic, Sinisa ; Daube-Witherspoon, Margaret E. ; Bacharach, Stephen L. ; Carson, Richard E.

  • Author_Institution
    Div. of Comput. Res. & Technol., Nat. Inst. of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
  • Volume
    17
  • Issue
    1
  • fYear
    1998
  • Firstpage
    9
  • Lastpage
    23
  • Abstract
    The authors analyzed the noise characteristics of two-dimensional (2-D) and three-dimensional (3-D) images obtained from the GE Advance positron emission tomography (PET) scanner. Three phantoms were used: a uniform 20-cm phantom, a 3-D Hoffman brain phantom, and a chest phantom with heart and lung inserts. Using gated acquisition, the authors acquired 20 statistically equivalent scans of each phantom in 2-D and 3-D modes at several activity levels. From these data, they calculated pixel normalized standard deviations (NSD´s), scaled to phantom mean, across the replicate scans, which allowed them to characterize the radial and axial distributions of pixel noise. The authors also performed sequential measurements of the phantoms in 2-D and 3-D modes to measure noise (from interpixel standard deviations) as a function of activity. To compensate for the difference in axial slice width between 2-D and 3-D images (due to the septa and reconstruction effects), they developed a smoothing kernel to apply to the 2-D data. After matching the resolution, the ratio of image-derived NSD values (NSD 2D/NSD 3D) 2 averaged throughout the uniform phantom was in good agreement with the noise equivalent count (NEC) ratio (NEC 3D/NEC 2D). By comparing different phantoms, the authors showed that the attenuation and emission distributions influence the spatial noise distribution. The estimates of pixel noise for 2-D and 3-D images produced here can be applied in the weighting of PET kinetic data and may be useful in the design of optimal dose and scanning requirements for PET studies. The accuracy of these phantom-based noise formulas should be validated for any given imaging situation, particularly in 3-D, if there is significant activity outside the scanner field of view.
  • Keywords
    brain; cardiology; lung; noise; positron emission tomography; 2-D PET images; 20 cm; 3-D Hoffman brain phantom; 3-D PET images; axial distribution; chest phantom; gated acquisition; heart insert; lung insert; medical diagnostic imaging; noise characteristics; nuclear medicine; pixel noise; radial distribution; replicate scans; uniform 20-cm phantom; Heart; Image analysis; Imaging phantoms; Lungs; Measurement standards; National electric code; Noise measurement; Performance evaluation; Positron emission tomography; Two dimensional displays; Artifacts; Brain; Humans; Phantoms, Imaging; Thorax; Tomography, Emission-Computed;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0278-0062
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/42.668691
  • Filename
    668691