Title :
Comparison of polarization handling methods in coherent optical systems
Author :
Noé, Reinhold ; Rodler, Hermann J. ; Ebberg, Alfred ; Gaukel, Gisela ; Noll, Bernd ; Wittmann, Julius ; Auracher, Franz
Author_Institution :
Siemens AG, Munchen, Germany
fDate :
10/1/1991 12:00:00 AM
Abstract :
The authors compare three polarization handling methods in coherent optical systems. These methods are: endless polarization control, polarization diversity, and data-induced polarization switching. These methods are also compared with active, data-synchronous polarization switching. It is seen that endless polarization control is potentially the most powerful candidate, however, the choice of polarization control devices remain questionable. Polarization diversity is as versatile as polarization control and is potentially the fastest method; however, it yields lower receiver sensitivity. Endless control or a well-designed diversity receiver should be used for coherent trunk systems. Data-induced polarization switching is restricted to frequency-shift-keying (FSK) systems. It promises a loss span similar to that of diversity, but is far simpler, which makes it recommendable for FSK distribution systems
Keywords :
frequency shift keying; light coherence; light polarisation; optical links; optical modulation; optical switches; receivers; FSK distribution systems; coherent optical systems; coherent trunk systems; data-induced polarization switching; endless polarization control; frequency-shift-keying; loss span; polarization control devices; polarization diversity; polarization handling methods; receiver sensitivity; Clocks; Electronics packaging; Frequency shift keying; Optical fiber polarization; Optical losses; Optical modulation; Optical polarization; Optical receivers; Optical sensors; Research and development;
Journal_Title :
Lightwave Technology, Journal of