• DocumentCode
    1504489
  • Title

    Efficient Extraction of Protein-Protein Interactions from Full-Text Articles

  • Author

    Hakenberg, Jörg ; Leaman, Robert ; Vo, Nguyen Ha ; Jonnalagadda, Siddhartha ; Sullivan, Ryan ; Miller, Christopher ; Tari, Luis ; Baral, Chitta ; Gonzalez, Graciela

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Comput. Sci., Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ, USA
  • Volume
    7
  • Issue
    3
  • fYear
    2010
  • Firstpage
    481
  • Lastpage
    494
  • Abstract
    Proteins and their interactions govern virtually all cellular processes, such as regulation, signaling, metabolism, and structure. Most experimental findings pertaining to such interactions are discussed in research papers, which, in turn, get curated by protein interaction databases. Authors, editors, and publishers benefit from efforts to alleviate the tasks of searching for relevant papers, evidence for physical interactions, and proper identifiers for each protein involved. The BioCreative II.5 community challenge addressed these tasks in a competition-style assessment to evaluate and compare different methodologies, to make aware of the increasing accuracy of automated methods, and to guide future implementations. In this paper, we present our approaches for protein-named entity recognition, including normalization, and for extraction of protein-protein interactions from full text. Our overall goal is to identify efficient individual components, and we compare various compositions to handle a single full-text article in between 10 seconds and 2 minutes. We propose strategies to transfer document-level annotations to the sentence-level, which allows for the creation of a more fine-grained training corpus; we use this corpus to automatically derive around 5,000 patterns. We rank sentences by relevance to the task of finding novel interactions with physical evidence, using a sentence classifier built from this training corpus. Heuristics for paraphrasing sentences help to further remove unnecessary information that might interfere with patterns, such as additional adjectives, clauses, or bracketed expressions. In BioCreative II.5, we achieved an f-score of 22 percent for finding protein interactions, and 43 percent for mapping proteins to UniProt IDs; disregarding species, f-scores are 30 percent and 55 percent, respectively. On average, our best-performing setup required around 2 minutes per full text. All data and pattern sets as well as Java classes that extend- - third-party software are available as supplementary information (see Appendix).
  • Keywords
    bioinformatics; cellular biophysics; information retrieval; proteins; text analysis; BioCreative II.5; Java class; cellular process; document-level annotation; fine-grained training corpus; protein interaction database; protein mapping; protein-protein interaction; Biology and genetics; bioinformatics (genome or protein) databases.; text analysis; Computational Biology; Data Mining; Databases, Genetic; Databases, Protein; Natural Language Processing; Periodicals as Topic; Protein Interaction Mapping; Societies, Scientific;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, IEEE/ACM Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    1545-5963
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TCBB.2010.51
  • Filename
    5473210