• DocumentCode
    1820489
  • Title

    Chromosome pairing for karyotyping purposes using mutual information

  • Author

    Khmelinskii, Artem ; Ventura, Rodrigo ; Sanches, Joao

  • Author_Institution
    Inst. for Syst. & Robot., Lisbon
  • fYear
    2008
  • fDate
    14-17 May 2008
  • Firstpage
    484
  • Lastpage
    487
  • Abstract
    Cytogenetics is the preferred tool in the diagnosis of genetic diseases such as leukemia and detection of aquired chromosomal abnormalities, such as translocations, deletions, monosomies or trisomies, etc. The karyotyping is a set of procedures, in the scope of the cytogenetics, that produces a visual representation of the 46 chromosomes, paired and arranged in decreasing order of size, observed during the metaphase step of the cellular division (meiosis). The pairing is the procedure in the karyotyping process where the homologous chromosomes are paired according to dimensional, morphological and textural similarity criteria. This process is time consuming and is usually performed manually by experts. An automatic pairing algorithm is still an open problem. In this paper we present new contributions to solve the automatic pairing problem in the scope of the karyotyping process for leukemia diagnostic purposes. Besides the traditional features used to compute the similarity between chromosomes, such as, normalized area, ellipsis axis length and banding profiles, we introduce the Mutual Information (MI) measure to assess the textural similarity between two chromosomes. A supervised linear classifier is trained to combine the different features computed from each pair, aiming at the correct pairing (as given by experts). The resulting classifier is then employed, together with a combinatorial optimization algorithm based on A*, to compute the pairing for any given image. Simulations using real images, obtained with a Leicatrade Optical Microscope DM 2500, were performed. These images were manually paired by experts and used as a ground truth for the pairing process to assess the performance of the proposed classifier. Furthermore, qualitative comparisons with the results obtained with a Leicatrade CW 4000 Karyo software were also performed.
  • Keywords
    biomedical optical imaging; cancer; cellular biophysics; combinatorial mathematics; genetic engineering; medical computing; medical image processing; molecular biophysics; optimisation; Leica CW 4000 Karyo software; Leica optical microscope DM 2500; automatic pairing algorithm; banding profile; cellular division; chromosome pairing; chromosome visual representation; combinatorial optimization algorithm; cytogenetics; ellipsis axis length; genetic disease diagnosis; karyotyping purpose; leukemia diagnostics; meiosis; mutual information; Area measurement; Biological cells; Computational modeling; Delta modulation; Diseases; Genetics; Length measurement; Mutual information; Optical microscopy; Software performance; Chromosome Pairing; Classification; Image processing; Leukemia; Mutual Information;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, 2008. ISBI 2008. 5th IEEE International Symposium on
  • Conference_Location
    Paris
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4244-2002-5
  • Electronic_ISBN
    978-1-4244-2003-2
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ISBI.2008.4541038
  • Filename
    4541038