DocumentCode :
1966641
Title :
Modular & benchtop instrument convergence decreases test costs and increases productivity
Author :
Morris, Mark W. ; Shaw, Boyd L. ; Ziomek, Christopher D.
Author_Institution :
ZTEC Instrum., Albuquerque
fYear :
2007
fDate :
17-20 Sept. 2007
Firstpage :
284
Lastpage :
290
Abstract :
The convergence of functionality between modular (e.g. VXI, PCI, PXI, LXI) and benchtop (conventional rack and stack) test and measurement instruments leads to decreased test costs and increased productivity for end users and their companies. Compared to benchtop instruments, the strengths of modular instruments are lower prices, easier system integration, and smaller footprints. In the past, however, most modular instruments have not provided the robust feature set and advanced analysis capabilities commonly found in benchtop instruments. Modular instrument usage is more widespread today as they become easier to use and offer many of the same advanced functions and features traditionally found in benchtop instruments. One key benefit of the modular/benchtop convergence is the emergence of "enterprise" instrumentation, where the same model of modular instrument hardware can be used in the design, validation, test, and even service sections of a company. It is possible to reconfigure soft front panel (SFP) applications to meet the needs of multiple users who may have dramatically different needs. For example, a design engineer may need an oscilloscope with historical memory to help with troubleshooting and may also need the ability to customize math waveform calculations. A validation engineer, not needing the advanced features required by the design engineer, might prefer a simplified user interface for basic testing. Likewise, a test engineer may only require a user interface for mask testing for simplified pass/fail determination. The ability of engineers or technicians in different sections of the company to use the same enterprise instrument results in decreased costs and increased productivity. Examples of cost savings include: decreased calibration and service costs; decreased training costs; and possibly quantity discounts from instrument vendors. An example of increased productivity is the use of consistent measurement algorithms at each stage in the design,- validate, test, and service process, providing repeatable results.
Keywords :
automatic testing; computerised instrumentation; user interfaces; benchtop instruments; enterprise instrumentation; modular instruments; reconfigure soft front panel; test costs; user interface; Companies; Convergence; Costs; Design engineering; Hardware; Instruments; Productivity; Robustness; Testing; User interfaces;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Autotestcon, 2007 IEEE
Conference_Location :
Baltimore, MD
ISSN :
1088-7725
Print_ISBN :
978-1-4244-1239-6
Electronic_ISBN :
1088-7725
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/AUTEST.2007.4374231
Filename :
4374231
Link To Document :
بازگشت