• DocumentCode
    1990456
  • Title

    Graphite nanoplatelet/silicone composites for thermal interface applications

  • Author

    Raza, M.A. ; Westwood, A.V.K. ; Stirling, C.

  • Author_Institution
    Inst. for Mater. Res., Univ. of Leeds, Leeds, UK
  • fYear
    2010
  • fDate
    Feb. 28 2010-March 2 2010
  • Firstpage
    34
  • Lastpage
    48
  • Abstract
    Thermally conducting and effectively electrically insulating nanocomposites for thermal interface applications were developed by dispersing graphite nanoplatelets (GNP) into a silicone matrix by dual asymmetric centrifuge mixing. Thermal conductivity, electrical conductivity, compression and hardness properties of the resulting composites were measured. The effects of GNP particle size and wt.% of GNP on the thermal conductivity and curing behaviour of the composites were also investigated. The results showed that the thermal conductivity of the GNP/silicone composites (having GNP with an average particle size of 15 ¿m), measured by the hot disk technique, reached 1.4 W/m.K at a loading of 20 wt.% (compared to 0.65 W/m.K for the, otherwise identical, system with an average particle size of 5 ¿m). The former represents a 7-fold increase compared to the thermal conductivity at 20°C of silicone alone. SEM analysis revealed that the composites consist of homogeneous randomly dispersed GNP in silicone at loading levels greater or equal to 15 wt.%, whereas at lower loadings a concentration gradient effect (due to settling) can be inferred. Differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) analysis showed that GNP addition increased the curing temperature of silicone from 92°C to 116°C, probably by hindering the free movement (mobility) of the silicone chains. Compression and Shore hardness testing results, perhaps unexpectedly, showed that the presence of the GNP did not increase the stiffness and compressive strength of the silicone. The GNP/silicone composites have thermal conductivities that are comparable to commercially available thermal interface materials but they have increased compliance, which is an advantage in gap-filling applications, whilst offering potential cost savings by using cheaper filler at lower loadings.
  • Keywords
    curing; differential scanning calorimetry; disperse systems; electrical conductivity; graphite; hardness; nanocomposites; nanofabrication; particle size; scanning electron microscopy; silicones; thermal conductivity; C-Si; SEM; compression; compressive strength; concentration gradient effect; curing; differential scanning calorimeter; dual asymmetric centrifuge mixing; electrical conductivity; electrically insulating nanocomposites; gap-filling application; graphite nanoplatelet dispersion; hot disk technique; particle size; shore hardness; silicone matrix; stiffness; thermal conductivity; thermal interface application; Conductivity measurement; Curing; Dielectrics and electrical insulation; Dispersion; Economic indicators; Electric variables measurement; Nanocomposites; Particle measurements; Thermal conductivity; Thermal loading; Composites; Graphite nanoplatelets; Thermal conductivity; Thermal interface materials;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Advanced Packaging Materials: Microtech, 2010. APM '10. International Symposium on
  • Conference_Location
    Cambridge
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4244-6756-3
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ISAPM.2010.5441382
  • Filename
    5441382