• DocumentCode
    2180102
  • Title

    Reliability predictions - continued reliance on a misleading approach

  • Author

    Jais, C. ; Werner, B. ; Das, Divya

  • Author_Institution
    Reliability Branch, US Army Materiel Syst. Anal. Activity, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA
  • fYear
    2013
  • fDate
    28-31 Jan. 2013
  • Firstpage
    1
  • Lastpage
    6
  • Abstract
    Reliability prediction methodologies, especially those centered on Military Handbook (MIL-HDBK) 217 and its progeny are highly controversial in their application. The use of reliability predictions in the design and operation of military applications have been in existence since the 1950´s. Various textbooks, articles, and workshops have provided insight on the pros and cons of these prediction methodologies. Recent research shows that these methods have produced highly inaccurate results when compared to actual test data for a number of military programs. These inaccuracies promote poor programmatic and design decisions, and often lead to reliability problems later in development. Major reasons for handbook prediction inaccuracies include but are not limited to: 1) The handbook database cannot keep pace with the rapid advances in the electronic industry. 2) Only a small portion of the overall system failure rate is addressed 3) Prediction methodologies rely soley on simple heuristics rather than considering sound engineering design principles. Rather than rely on inaccurate handbook methodologies, a reliability assessment methodology is recommended. The reliability assessment methodology includes utilizing reliability data from comparable systems, historical test data, and leveraging subject-matter-expert input. System developers then apply fault-tree analysis (or similar analyses) to identify weaknesses in the system design. The elements of the fault tree are assessed against well-defined criteria to determine where additional testing and design for reliability efforts are needed. This assessment methodology becomes a tool for reliability engineers, and ultimately program managers, to manage the risk of their reliability program early in the design phase when information is limted to: 1) The handbook database cannot keep pace with the rapid advances in the electronic industry. 2) Only a small portion of the overall system failure rate is addressed 3) Prediction - ethodologies rely solely on simple heuristics rather than considering sound engineering design principles.
  • Keywords
    defence industry; fault trees; MIL-HDBK; electronic industry; fault-tree analysis; military application; military handbook; reliability assessment methodology; reliability prediction; system failure rate; Integrated circuit reliability; Printed circuits; Reliability engineering; Standards; US Department of Defense; Military Handbook 217; reliability assessment; reliability predictions;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS), 2013 Proceedings - Annual
  • Conference_Location
    Orlando, FL
  • ISSN
    0149-144X
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4673-4709-9
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/RAMS.2013.6517751
  • Filename
    6517751