DocumentCode
2188208
Title
Individual Differences that Predict Interactions in Mixed-Initiative Teams
Author
Zongrone, Bianca M. ; Derrick, Douglas C. ; Ligon, Gina Scott
Author_Institution
Univ. of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE, USA
fYear
2015
fDate
5-8 Jan. 2015
Firstpage
610
Lastpage
618
Abstract
Humans and machines are collaborating in new ways and organizations are increasingly leveraging mixed-initiative teams. We examine the effect that an individual\´s personality has on his or her willingness to: (1) seek assistance from and/or (2) accept the recommendations of an automated teammate. We use a game of pure strategy with a perfectly accurate decision-assisting automated agent to examine how personality predicts these interactions. Forty-nine participants played 3 rounds of a decision game called "Pirate Island." Each participant made 27 total decisions (9 decisions per round over 3 rounds) and had the option to solicit assistance from an automated agent for each decision. Participants were not told that the agent was 100% accurate, only that it could help them. We found that people low on extroversion and high on agreeableness were highly correlated to soliciting recommendations from an agent. However, only those high on agreeableness actually accepted recommendations.
Keywords
computer games; decision making; human computer interaction; software agents; team working; Pirate Island; automated teammate; decision game; decision-assisting automated agent; human machine interaction; individual differences; interaction prediction; mixed-initiative teams; organizations; Atmospheric measurements; Computers; Correlation; Decision making; Games; Particle measurements; Predictive models; automated agents; decision making; personality;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
System Sciences (HICSS), 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on
Conference_Location
Kauai, HI
ISSN
1530-1605
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/HICSS.2015.79
Filename
7069728
Link To Document