DocumentCode :
2212617
Title :
Performance comparison of 8, 16 and 32 column RF birdcage resonators
Author :
Pascone, Romeo ; Vullo, Thomas ; Tankhiwale, Arun ; Cahill, Patrick T.
Author_Institution :
Manhattan Coll., Riverdale, NY, USA
Volume :
2
fYear :
1995
fDate :
21-28 Oct 1995
Firstpage :
1136
Abstract :
This study compares performance characteristics for birdcage coils having 8, 16 and 32 columns. Self and effective (self plus mutual) inductances and resistances were calculated for 6 coils having 8, 16 and 32 columns, and quality factors were determined using self (Qs) and effective (Qe) inductances. Qs decreased with increasing number of columns where the average Qs ratio for column ratios of 16:8 and 32:8 were 0.85 and 0.65, respectively. Qe increased with increasing number of columns, where the values for 16:8 and 32:8 were 1.05 and 1.11. Using Biot-Savart calculations, improved field uniformity was seen with a greater number of columns. This study quantified the advantage of fabricating birdcage coils with a greater number of columns
Keywords :
biomedical NMR; biomedical equipment; coils; inductance; resonators; transmission line theory; 16 column; 32 column; 63.4 MHz; 8 column; Biot-Savart calculations; MRI; RF birdcage resonators; birdcage coils; column ratios; effective inductances; field uniformity; performance characteristics; quality factors; resistances; self inductances; Capacitance; Coils; Educational institutions; Hospitals; Inductance; Magnetic resonance imaging; Performance evaluation; Q factor; Radio frequency; Signal to noise ratio;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record, 1995., 1995 IEEE
Conference_Location :
San Francisco, CA
Print_ISBN :
0-7803-3180-X
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/NSSMIC.1995.510463
Filename :
510463
Link To Document :
بازگشت