• DocumentCode
    2437981
  • Title

    Autonomous Fault Protection Orbit Domain Modeling In Aerobraking

  • Author

    Kenworthy, John C. ; Seale, Eric H. ; Dates, Jason A.

  • Author_Institution
    Lockheed Martin Space Syst. Co., Denver
  • fYear
    2007
  • fDate
    3-10 March 2007
  • Firstpage
    1
  • Lastpage
    6
  • Abstract
    The Spacecraft Imbedded Distributed Error Response (SPIDER) Fault Protection architecture used on the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) incrementally developed capabilities based upon heritage spacecraft. The primary driving factors behind the improvements for this mission stemmed from several key concerns and development goals/requirements. Due to decreased risk tolerance at the program level, most hardware was cross-strapped on the spacecraft and additional autonomous responses were required to ensure the safety of the spacecraft to provide for a more robust handling of the system during high-risk events. Numerous interplanetary spacecraft missions have demonstrated the need to reduce maintenance effort during spacecraft operations. Aerobraking: the process of using atmospheric drag to dissipate orbital energy to achieve the desired science orbit following orbit insertion is a delicate process. The operations team is constrained by orbit geometry, 2-way light time delays, Martian weather, and a highly dynamic environment in which each pass through the atmosphere affects the subsequent orbit timing in a non-deterministic way. In the event of a fault on past missions, the operations team has required both constant contact with the spacecraft to diagnose the failure, and prompt issuance of the necessary ground commands to ensure spacecraft safety. In order to increase the autonomous response capability during Aerobraking and reduce the response time to faults, MRO developed a new set of capabilities, called the Navigation Performance Monitor (NPM). NPM, a member of the performance layer of SPIDER Fault Protection software, provides autonomous orbit domain modeling so the spacecraft may configure itself correctly for events within each orbit. During Aerobraking for MRO, NPM was called into action and successfully provided orbit modeling data to the Safe Mode software in response to two system faults; this demonstrated the robustness of our approach.
  • Keywords
    Mars; aerospace computing; aerospace engineering; planetary atmospheres; space vehicles; Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter; Martian weather; SPIDER; aerobraking; atmospheric drag; autonomous fault protection; autonomous orbit domain; ground commands; interplanetary spacecraft missions; navigation performance monitor; nondeterministic way; safe mode software; spacecraft imbedded distributed error response; spacecraft safety; Aerodynamics; Delay effects; Geometry; Hardware; Mars; Protection; Reconnaissance; Robustness; Safety; Space vehicles;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Aerospace Conference, 2007 IEEE
  • Conference_Location
    Big Sky, MT
  • ISSN
    1095-323X
  • Print_ISBN
    1-4244-0524-6
  • Electronic_ISBN
    1095-323X
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/AERO.2007.352646
  • Filename
    4161524