• DocumentCode
    265083
  • Title

    Personal Health Records Success: Why Google Health Failed and What Does that Mean for Microsoft HealthVault?

  • Author

    Spil, Ton ; Klein, Reinhard

  • Author_Institution
    Ind. Eng. & Bus. Inf. Syst., Univ. of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
  • fYear
    2014
  • fDate
    6-9 Jan. 2014
  • Firstpage
    2818
  • Lastpage
    2827
  • Abstract
    Five years of experimenting with Personal Health Records has not yielded the results that big companies like Google and Microsoft expected. Whereas Google pulled the plug on its product offering, Microsoft struggles to reach sufficient critical mass. This study adopts a user perspective (51 interviews) in conjunction with grounded theory, to offer explanations why Google Health failed and predictions relative to Microsoft´s ability to reach a tipping point with respect to product/service viability. Noteworthy, vendors ignore relevance, or perceived usefulness when designing PHRs. Moreover, low trust and high risks do not bode well for long-term success, with the widely used information systems success models often neglecting the latter two critical dimensions.
  • Keywords
    electronic health records; information systems; records management; Google Health; Microsoft HealthVault; grounded theory; information systems; personal health records; Accuracy; Context; Data models; Google; Interviews; Medical services; Usability; Personal Health Record; adoption; e-health;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    System Sciences (HICSS), 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Waikoloa, HI
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/HICSS.2014.353
  • Filename
    6758953