• DocumentCode
    26684
  • Title

    Transfer Learning Improves Supervised Image Segmentation Across Imaging Protocols

  • Author

    van Opbroek, Annegreet ; Ikram, M. Arfan ; Vernooij, Meike W. ; de Bruijne, Marleen

  • Author_Institution
    Depts. of Med. Inf. & Radiol., Biomed. Imaging Group Rotterdam, Erasmus MC - Univ. Med. Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
  • Volume
    34
  • Issue
    5
  • fYear
    2015
  • fDate
    May-15
  • Firstpage
    1018
  • Lastpage
    1030
  • Abstract
    The variation between images obtained with different scanners or different imaging protocols presents a major challenge in automatic segmentation of biomedical images. This variation especially hampers the application of otherwise successful supervised-learning techniques which, in order to perform well, often require a large amount of labeled training data that is exactly representative of the target data. We therefore propose to use transfer learning for image segmentation. Transfer-learning techniques can cope with differences in distributions between training and target data, and therefore may improve performance over supervised learning for segmentation across scanners and scan protocols. We present four transfer classifiers that can train a classification scheme with only a small amount of representative training data, in addition to a larger amount of other training data with slightly different characteristics. The performance of the four transfer classifiers was compared to that of standard supervised classification on two magnetic resonance imaging brain-segmentation tasks with multi-site data: white matter, gray matter, and cerebrospinal fluid segmentation; and white-matter-/MS-lesion segmentation. The experiments showed that when there is only a small amount of representative training data available, transfer learning can greatly outperform common supervised-learning approaches, minimizing classification errors by up to 60%.
  • Keywords
    biomedical MRI; brain; image classification; image segmentation; learning (artificial intelligence); medical image processing; neurophysiology; automatic segmentation; biomedical images; cerebrospinal fluid segmentation; classification scheme; gray matter; image variation; imaging protocols; labeled training data; magnetic resonance imaging brain-segmentation tasks; minimizing classification errors; multisite data; representative training data; standard supervised classification; supervised image segmentation; supervised-learning techniques; target data distributions; transfer classifiers; transfer learning; white-matter-MS-lesion segmentation; Biomedical imaging; Image segmentation; Kernel; Protocols; Support vector machines; Training; Training data; Image Segmentation; machine learning; magnetic resonance imaging; pattern recognition; transfer learning;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0278-0062
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TMI.2014.2366792
  • Filename
    6945865