Title :
Cooperative Versus Receiver Coded Diversity with Low-Complexity Encoding and Decoding
Author :
Alnawayseh, Saif E A ; Loskot, Pavel
Author_Institution :
Inst. of Adv. Telecommun., Swansea Univ., Swansea, UK
Abstract :
The amplify-and-forward (AF) and the decode-and-forward (DF) cooperative coded diversity is compared with the conventional receiver coded diversity in terms of the bit error rate (BER). The comparison assumes channel coding with non-binary modulations, and fast fading channels with path-loss attenuation proportional to the distance between nodes. Numerical results obtained by extensive computer simulations suggest that, for our path-loss system model, the AF diversity outperforms the receiver diversity provided that the relay is closer to the source and to the destination than the distance between the source and the destination. This condition can be satisfied more easily provided that there is more than one relay about the source, and for higher order modulations. In addition, the BER performance of the DF relaying is found to be more sensitive to the relay location than the BER performance of the AF relaying.
Keywords :
communication complexity; decoding; diversity reception; encoding; error statistics; modulation; AF diversity; AF relaying; BER; amplify-and-forward cooperative coded diversity; bit error rate; channel coding; computer simulations; decode-and-forward cooperative coded diversity; decoding; fast fading channels; higher order modulations; low-complexity encoding; nonbinary modulations; path-loss attenuation; path-loss system model; receiver coded diversity; Attenuation; Bit error rate; Channel coding; Computer simulation; Decoding; Encoding; Fading; Modulation coding; Protective relaying; Relays;
Conference_Titel :
Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC 2010-Spring), 2010 IEEE 71st
Conference_Location :
Taipei
Print_ISBN :
978-1-4244-2518-1
Electronic_ISBN :
1550-2252
DOI :
10.1109/VETECS.2010.5493780