DocumentCode :
2804717
Title :
A Comparison between K-Means, FCM and ckMeans Algorithms
Author :
de Vargas, Rogerio R. ; Bedregal, Benjamín R C ; Palmeira, Eduardo Silva
Author_Institution :
Dept. de Inf. e Mat. Aplic., Univ. Fed. do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil
fYear :
2011
fDate :
24-26 Aug. 2011
Firstpage :
32
Lastpage :
38
Abstract :
Fuzzy C-Means, introduced by Jim Bezdek in 1981 is one of the earliest and most popular fuzzy clustering algorithms. However, in order to improve the hit rate or speed, over the years several modifications have been proposed. Among these we highlight the ckMeans algorithm proposed by us in 2010 which make a change in the way to calculate the center of the clusters of FCM. The idea is to use an auxiliary membership function of elements to those clusters that are essentially crisp and calculate the centroids following a similar process as done in K-Means algorithm but keeping the same procedures as in FCM in the rest of algorithm. In fact, this hybridization between FCM and K-Means motivated the name ckMeans for this variant of the FCM. In this article we apply K-Means, FCM and ckMeans algorithms in a validated database of mammograms with about a thousand elements and compare these three algorithms in terms of hit rate and number of each iterations and the computational processing time until the convergency of the system.
Keywords :
fuzzy set theory; iterative methods; mammography; pattern clustering; visual databases; FCM algorithm; auxiliary membership function; ckmeans algorithm; computational processing; fuzzy C-means clustering algorithm; k-means algorithm; mammogram database; Clustering algorithms; Databases; Design automation; Kernel; Laser radar; Robustness; Tutorials; Center Clusters; FCM; K-Meas; ckMeans;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Theoretical Computer Science (WEIT), 2011 Workshop-School on
Conference_Location :
Pelotas, RS
Print_ISBN :
978-1-4673-0225-8
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/WEIT.2011.28
Filename :
6114815
Link To Document :
بازگشت