DocumentCode
296123
Title
HILDA: knowledge extraction from neural networks in legal rule based and case based reasoning
Author
Egri, Peter A. ; Underwood, Peter F.
Author_Institution
Fac. of Law & Legal Practice, Univ. of Technol., Sydney, NSW, Australia
Volume
4
fYear
1995
fDate
Nov/Dec 1995
Firstpage
1800
Abstract
A major requirement for legal expert systems involved in generating legal advice and purporting to adjudicate on disputes is that they explain their reasoning. Even systems involved in predicting the outcomes of legal disputes are enhanced by this facility. Difficulties in extracting knowledge from neural networks (“NNs”) have made their application to legal expert systems somewhat limited. HILDA incorporates some aspects of rule based reasoning (“RBR”) and case based reasoning (“CBR”) to assist the user in predicting case outcomes and generating arguments and case decisions. The system can use the NN to guide RBR and CBR in a number of ways. Knowledge extracted from a NN could also be used to iteratively refine the system´s domain theory. This refined domain theory is one way in which HILDA can carry out RBR and CBR
Keywords
case-based reasoning; expert systems; knowledge acquisition; law administration; HILDA; case decisions; case outcomes; domain theory; knowledge extraction; legal case based reasoning; legal expert systems; legal rule based reasoning; neural networks; Australia; Computer aided software engineering; Contracts; Expert systems; Intelligent networks; Law; Legal factors; Legislation; Mirrors; Neural networks;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Neural Networks, 1995. Proceedings., IEEE International Conference on
Conference_Location
Perth, WA
Print_ISBN
0-7803-2768-3
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/ICNN.1995.488894
Filename
488894
Link To Document