• DocumentCode
    296123
  • Title

    HILDA: knowledge extraction from neural networks in legal rule based and case based reasoning

  • Author

    Egri, Peter A. ; Underwood, Peter F.

  • Author_Institution
    Fac. of Law & Legal Practice, Univ. of Technol., Sydney, NSW, Australia
  • Volume
    4
  • fYear
    1995
  • fDate
    Nov/Dec 1995
  • Firstpage
    1800
  • Abstract
    A major requirement for legal expert systems involved in generating legal advice and purporting to adjudicate on disputes is that they explain their reasoning. Even systems involved in predicting the outcomes of legal disputes are enhanced by this facility. Difficulties in extracting knowledge from neural networks (“NNs”) have made their application to legal expert systems somewhat limited. HILDA incorporates some aspects of rule based reasoning (“RBR”) and case based reasoning (“CBR”) to assist the user in predicting case outcomes and generating arguments and case decisions. The system can use the NN to guide RBR and CBR in a number of ways. Knowledge extracted from a NN could also be used to iteratively refine the system´s domain theory. This refined domain theory is one way in which HILDA can carry out RBR and CBR
  • Keywords
    case-based reasoning; expert systems; knowledge acquisition; law administration; HILDA; case decisions; case outcomes; domain theory; knowledge extraction; legal case based reasoning; legal expert systems; legal rule based reasoning; neural networks; Australia; Computer aided software engineering; Contracts; Expert systems; Intelligent networks; Law; Legal factors; Legislation; Mirrors; Neural networks;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Neural Networks, 1995. Proceedings., IEEE International Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Perth, WA
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-2768-3
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ICNN.1995.488894
  • Filename
    488894