DocumentCode
2969012
Title
The appropriateness of Gutman´s means-end chain model in software evaluation
Author
Wong, Bernard
Author_Institution
Dept. of Inf. Syst., Univ. of Technol., Sydney, NSW, Australia
fYear
2002
fDate
2002
Firstpage
56
Lastpage
65
Abstract
The primary objective of this paper was to examine the extent to which Gutman´s Means-End Chain Model can be used to describe the influences given to the choice of characteristics used in software evaluation. This objective was accomplished by developing a theoretical model for software evaluation based on Gutman´s Model, and empirically testing the model with quantitative techniques. The study utilized commercial Australian companies and involved a survey of 403 subjects, which were then analyzed quantitatively with bi-variate analysis. Results of the quantitative analysis provided a number of important insights and suggest several conclusions. The quantitative study showed that strong relationships between the characteristics and the values, affected by the use of the software, exist. The study also showed that desired consequences are related to both characteristics and values. The results provide a number of important insights and suggest several conclusions. The study showed (1) that there is support for applying Gutman´s Means-end chain model in software evaluation; (2) that non-ISO9126 characteristics are also important for software evaluation; (3) that the characteristic, consequence, value relationship can be valuable to benefit the Goal Question Metric model.
Keywords
software quality; Gutman means-end chain model; bivariate analysis; goal question metric model; quantitative study; software evaluation; Appropriate technology; Australia; Couplings; Decision making; Engineering management; Information systems; Quality management; Software engineering; Software quality; Software testing;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Empirical Software Engineering, 2002. Proceedings. 2002 International Symposium n
Print_ISBN
0-7695-1796-X
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/ISESE.2002.1166926
Filename
1166926
Link To Document