DocumentCode :
2970211
Title :
Comparison of isothermal, constant current and SWEAT wafer level EM testing methods
Author :
Lee, Tom C. ; Tibel, Deborah ; Sullivan, Timothy D.
Author_Institution :
Div. of Microelectron., IBM Corp., Essex Junction, VT, USA
fYear :
2000
fDate :
2000
Firstpage :
61
Lastpage :
69
Abstract :
In this paper, we present data from three wafer level electromigration test techniques, isothermal, constant current, and standard wafer level electromigration accelerated test (SWEAT), and compare various aspects of the data. The isothermal method keeps the test line at a constant temperature by monitoring line resistance during test. The constant current method simply applies a constant current of the same magnitude to all lines, without making any adjustments for individual geometric differences. The SWEAT method holds the time to failure constant by using Black´s equation to determine the applied current needed to bring about the chosen failure time. Six different line widths ranging from 0.150 to 4.285 μm of AlCu metallization were stressed by all three methods, at temperatures from 300 to 380°C in 10°C steps
Keywords :
aluminium alloys; copper alloys; electromigration; failure analysis; life testing; metallisation; 0.150 to 4.285 micron; 300 to 380 C; AlCu; AlCu metallization; Black equation; SWEAT method; constant current method; failure time; isothermal method; wafer-level electromigration testing; Condition monitoring; Electromigration; Equations; Isothermal processes; Life estimation; Metallization; Temperature distribution; Temperature measurement; Temperature sensors; Testing;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Integrated Reliability Workshop Final Report, 2000 IEEE International
Conference_Location :
Lake Tahoe, CA
Print_ISBN :
0-7803-6392-2
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/IRWS.2000.911902
Filename :
911902
Link To Document :
بازگشت