Title :
Agents, information and negotiation
Author_Institution :
Inst. of Res. on Artificial Intell., Spanish Council for Sci. Res. (CSIC), Barcelona
Abstract :
Successful negotiators prepare by determining their position along five dimensions: legitimacy, options, goals, independence, and commitment, (LOGIC). Ipsilall introduce a negotiation model based on these dimensions and on two primitive concepts: intimacy (degree of closeness) and balance (degree of fairness). The intimacy is a pair of matrices that evaluate both an agentpsilas contribution to the relationship and its opponentpsilas contribution each from an information view and from a utilitarian view across the five LOGIC dimensions. The balance is the difference between these matrices. A relationship strategy maintains a target intimacy for each relationship that an agent would like the relationship to move towards in future. The negotiation strategy maintains a set of options that are in-line with the current intimacy level, and then tactics wrap the options in argumentation with the aim of attaining a successful deal and manipulating the successive negotiation balances towards the target intimacy.
Keywords :
artificial intelligence; LOGIC dimensions; degree of closeness; degree of fairness; negotiation model; target intimacy; Application software; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Councils; Databases; Ecosystems; Logic; Multiagent systems; Ontologies; Semantic Web;
Conference_Titel :
Digital Ecosystems and Technologies, 2008. DEST 2008. 2nd IEEE International Conference on
Conference_Location :
Phitsanulok
Print_ISBN :
978-1-4244-1489-5
Electronic_ISBN :
978-1-4244-1490-1
DOI :
10.1109/DEST.2008.4635096