• DocumentCode
    2979045
  • Title

    On the difference between two widely publicized methods for analyzing oscillator phase behavior

  • Author

    Vanassche, Piet ; Gielen, Georges ; Sansen, Willy

  • Author_Institution
    ESAT/MICAS, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
  • fYear
    2002
  • fDate
    10-14 Nov. 2002
  • Firstpage
    229
  • Lastpage
    233
  • Abstract
    This paper describes the similarities and differences between two widely publicized methods for analyzing oscillator phase behavior. The methods were presented by Adler (1946) and Hajimiri and Lee (1998). It is pointed out that both methods are almost alike. While Alder´s one in can be shown to be, mathematically, more exact, the approximate method of Hajimiri and Lee is somewhat simpler, facilitating its use for purposes of analysis and design. In this paper, we show that, for stationary input noise sources, both methods produce equal results for the oscillator´s phase noise behavior. However, when considering injection locking, it is shown that both methods yield different results, with the approximation of Hajimiri and Lee being unable to predict the locking behavior. In general, when the input signal causing the oscillator phase perturbations is non-stationary, the exact model produces the correct results while results obtained using the approximate model break down.
  • Keywords
    circuit noise; injection locked oscillators; network analysis; phase noise; radiofrequency oscillators; analysis methods; approximate method; injection locking; oscillator phase behavior analysis; phase noise behavior; Circuit noise; Frequency; Injection-locked oscillators; Integral equations; Mutual coupling; Phase noise; Predictive models;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Computer Aided Design, 2002. ICCAD 2002. IEEE/ACM International Conference on
  • ISSN
    1092-3152
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-7607-2
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ICCAD.2002.1167539
  • Filename
    1167539