DocumentCode
3023675
Title
Ink normalization and beautification
Author
Simard, Patrice Y. ; Steinkraus, Dave ; Agrawala, Maneesh
Author_Institution
Microsoft Res., One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA, USA
fYear
2005
fDate
29 Aug.-1 Sept. 2005
Firstpage
1182
Abstract
Handwriting recognition is difficult because of the high variability of handwriting and because of segmentation errors. We propose an approach that reduces this variability without requiring letter segmentation. We build an ink extrema classifier which labels local minima of ink as {bottom, baseline, other} and maxima as {midline, top, other}. Despite the high variability of ink, the classifier is 86% accurate (with 0% rejection). We use the classifier information to normalize the ink. This is done by applying a "rubber sheet" warping followed by a "rubber rod" warping. Both warpings are computed using conjugate gradient methods. We display the normalization results on a few examples. This paper illustrates the pitfalls of ink normalization and "beautification ", when solved independently of letter recognition.
Keywords
conjugate gradient methods; handwriting recognition; conjugate gradient methods; handwriting recognition; ink beautification; ink extrema classifier; ink normalization; letter recognition; letter segmentation; rubber rod warping; rubber sheet warping; Data mining; Displays; Entropy; Gradient methods; Handwriting recognition; Histograms; Ink; Labeling; Machine learning; Spatial databases;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Document Analysis and Recognition, 2005. Proceedings. Eighth International Conference on
ISSN
1520-5263
Print_ISBN
0-7695-2420-6
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/ICDAR.2005.143
Filename
1575730
Link To Document