DocumentCode :
3063888
Title :
Fractal dimension, only a fraction of the truth?
Author :
Albregtsen, Fritz ; Nielsen, Birgitte ; Yogesan, Kanagasingam
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Inf., Oslo Univ., Norway
fYear :
1992
fDate :
30 Aug-3 Sep 1992
Firstpage :
733
Lastpage :
736
Abstract :
A sequence of synthetic images is used in order to compare three different fractal dimension estimation methods. The best methods are then applied to TEM images of mouse liver cell nuclei, to see if the methods are able to distinguish between normal cells and cells with induced cancer. The authors find that an ∈-blanket method gives the best estimate of the fractal dimension, and also the best separation between the two types of cells. However, fractal dimension and a simplified lacunarity feature are not sufficient for a reliable discrimination between the two classes of cells. Finally, the authors demonstrate that one can easily derive a fractal dimension related texture feature from the difference in the number of gray level runs at two different gray value quantization widths
Keywords :
biological techniques and instruments; cellular biophysics; fractals; image segmentation; image sequences; image texture; liver; transmission electron microscopy; TEM images; cellular biophysics; discrimination; fractal dimension estimation methods; gray value quantization widths; image segmentation; image texture; in -blanket method; induced cancer; mouse liver cell nuclei; normal; simplified lacunarity feature; synthetic images; texture feature; Biological system modeling; Cancer; Fractals; Image segmentation; Informatics; Liver; Mice; Probability distribution; Quantization; Tellurium;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Pattern Recognition, 1992. Vol.III. Conference C: Image, Speech and Signal Analysis, Proceedings., 11th IAPR International Conference on
Conference_Location :
The Hague
Print_ISBN :
0-8186-2920-7
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/ICPR.1992.202091
Filename :
202091
Link To Document :
بازگشت