DocumentCode
3129790
Title
Can texture and image content retrieval methods match human perception?
Author
Payne, Janet S. ; Stonbam, T.J.
Author_Institution
Dept. of Comput., Buckinghamshire Chilterns Univ. Coll., High Wycombe, UK
fYear
2001
fDate
2001
Firstpage
154
Lastpage
157
Abstract
Texture is widely used in content based image retrieval (CBIR), and there have been a number of studies over the years to establish which features are perceptually significant. However, it is still difficult to retrieve reliably images that the human user would agree are “similar”. Different studies tend to use different image databases, but the Brodatz textures are widely recognised, and form a standard test set. This paper outlines a number of performance measures, and uses the results from a human study to classify textures from the Brodatz textures dataset to define “relevance” and hence compute correlation between each technique and the perceptually derived ranking. Our results how that in general image content-based retrieval methods do not match human perception well
Keywords
content-based retrieval; image retrieval; image texture; visual databases; Brodatz textures; content based image retrieval; human perception; image databases; Content based retrieval; Educational institutions; Frequency; Humans; Image databases; Image recognition; Image retrieval; Labeling; Shape; Testing;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Intelligent Multimedia, Video and Speech Processing, 2001. Proceedings of 2001 International Symposium on
Conference_Location
Hong Kong
Print_ISBN
962-85766-2-3
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/ISIMP.2001.925355
Filename
925355
Link To Document