• DocumentCode
    3129790
  • Title

    Can texture and image content retrieval methods match human perception?

  • Author

    Payne, Janet S. ; Stonbam, T.J.

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Comput., Buckinghamshire Chilterns Univ. Coll., High Wycombe, UK
  • fYear
    2001
  • fDate
    2001
  • Firstpage
    154
  • Lastpage
    157
  • Abstract
    Texture is widely used in content based image retrieval (CBIR), and there have been a number of studies over the years to establish which features are perceptually significant. However, it is still difficult to retrieve reliably images that the human user would agree are “similar”. Different studies tend to use different image databases, but the Brodatz textures are widely recognised, and form a standard test set. This paper outlines a number of performance measures, and uses the results from a human study to classify textures from the Brodatz textures dataset to define “relevance” and hence compute correlation between each technique and the perceptually derived ranking. Our results how that in general image content-based retrieval methods do not match human perception well
  • Keywords
    content-based retrieval; image retrieval; image texture; visual databases; Brodatz textures; content based image retrieval; human perception; image databases; Content based retrieval; Educational institutions; Frequency; Humans; Image databases; Image recognition; Image retrieval; Labeling; Shape; Testing;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Intelligent Multimedia, Video and Speech Processing, 2001. Proceedings of 2001 International Symposium on
  • Conference_Location
    Hong Kong
  • Print_ISBN
    962-85766-2-3
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ISIMP.2001.925355
  • Filename
    925355