• DocumentCode
    3132096
  • Title

    The comparison of conventional Yaw Axis control versus Closed Loop Yaw Axis control

  • Author

    Kunru, Ju ; Renjie, Zhang ; Danli, Xu

  • Author_Institution
    Inf. & Eng. Dept., TV Univ., Shanghai, China
  • Volume
    2
  • fYear
    2011
  • fDate
    20-21 Aug. 2011
  • Firstpage
    138
  • Lastpage
    141
  • Abstract
    The primary flight control system (PFCS) provides full time and full authority three axis, dynamic control law functions (pitch, roll and yaw) and non-dynamic control law functions (aileron droop, speed brake and ground lift dump). In addition, the PFCS calculates operational and limiting airspeed in order to provide full flight envelope protection across the entire flight envelope. PFCS provides limited gust alleviation function in the yaw axis. This paper provides a high level comparison of conventional Yaw Axis control (Pedal to Surface with Augmentation) versus Closed Loop Yaw Axis control. Pedal to Surface versus Closed Loop design options have implications on a variety of factors including Human Factors, Gust Response, structural limiting requirements, asymmetric thrust response, and rudder trim.
  • Keywords
    aerospace control; closed loop systems; control system synthesis; closed loop design; closed loop yaw axis control; dynamic control law functions; primary flight control system; Acceleration; Aerospace control; Aircraft; Aircraft propulsion; Damping; Engines; Shock absorbers; Asymmetric thrust response; Closed Loop Yaw Axis Design; Conventional Yaw Axis Design; Gust Response; Rudder Trim;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Computing, Control and Industrial Engineering (CCIE), 2011 IEEE 2nd International Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Wuhan
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4244-9599-3
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/CCIENG.2011.6008086
  • Filename
    6008086