DocumentCode
3140089
Title
B2B, B2C and C2C: Should They be Treated Equally in China
Author
Shi, Jianxin ; Wu, Yongxiang
Author_Institution
Sch. of Manage., Harbin Inst. of Technol.
fYear
2006
fDate
38838
Firstpage
498
Lastpage
501
Abstract
Compared with traditional commerce, ecommerce has tremendous advantages. A seller can easily access worldwide markets despite geographic distance at lower costs, compete with larges companies because of the low barrier to entry, know customers well and then sell more products through tracking purchases and make use of data of customers. According to the different parties in ecommerce activities, ecommerce is divided into three types: B2B (business-to-business), B2C (business-to-customer) and C2C (customer-to-customer). In a complete market, B2B, B2C and C2C shouldn´t be treated discriminately. However, in an incomplete and undeveloped environment, such as China, there exist a lot of bottlenecks related to information and cost. With the analysis in the information-and-cost view, it is found out that those obstacles affect B2B, B2C and C2C quite differently and B2B should be given the first rank to develop. Accordingly, policy suggestions are represented
Keywords
electronic commerce; socio-economic effects; China; business-to-business ecommerce; business-to-customer ecommerce; customer-to-customer ecommerce; Business; Companies; Consumer electronics; Costs; Electronic commerce; Marketing and sales; Technology management; Time factors; Web and internet services; business models; ecommerce; policies;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2006. CCECE '06. Canadian Conference on
Conference_Location
Ottawa, Ont.
Print_ISBN
1-4244-0038-4
Electronic_ISBN
1-4244-0038-4
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/CCECE.2006.277426
Filename
4054854
Link To Document