• DocumentCode
    3140089
  • Title

    B2B, B2C and C2C: Should They be Treated Equally in China

  • Author

    Shi, Jianxin ; Wu, Yongxiang

  • Author_Institution
    Sch. of Manage., Harbin Inst. of Technol.
  • fYear
    2006
  • fDate
    38838
  • Firstpage
    498
  • Lastpage
    501
  • Abstract
    Compared with traditional commerce, ecommerce has tremendous advantages. A seller can easily access worldwide markets despite geographic distance at lower costs, compete with larges companies because of the low barrier to entry, know customers well and then sell more products through tracking purchases and make use of data of customers. According to the different parties in ecommerce activities, ecommerce is divided into three types: B2B (business-to-business), B2C (business-to-customer) and C2C (customer-to-customer). In a complete market, B2B, B2C and C2C shouldn´t be treated discriminately. However, in an incomplete and undeveloped environment, such as China, there exist a lot of bottlenecks related to information and cost. With the analysis in the information-and-cost view, it is found out that those obstacles affect B2B, B2C and C2C quite differently and B2B should be given the first rank to develop. Accordingly, policy suggestions are represented
  • Keywords
    electronic commerce; socio-economic effects; China; business-to-business ecommerce; business-to-customer ecommerce; customer-to-customer ecommerce; Business; Companies; Consumer electronics; Costs; Electronic commerce; Marketing and sales; Technology management; Time factors; Web and internet services; business models; ecommerce; policies;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2006. CCECE '06. Canadian Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Ottawa, Ont.
  • Print_ISBN
    1-4244-0038-4
  • Electronic_ISBN
    1-4244-0038-4
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/CCECE.2006.277426
  • Filename
    4054854