• DocumentCode
    31570
  • Title

    Sensitivity of Noninvasive Cardiac Electrophysiological Imaging to Variations in Personalized Anatomical Modeling

  • Author

    Rahimi, Azar ; Linwei Wang

  • Author_Institution
    Galisano Coll. of Comput. & Inf. Sci., Rochester Inst. of Technol., Rochester, NY, USA
  • Volume
    62
  • Issue
    6
  • fYear
    2015
  • fDate
    Jun-15
  • Firstpage
    1563
  • Lastpage
    1575
  • Abstract
    Objective: Noninvasive cardiac electrophysiological (EP) imaging techniques rely on anatomically-detailed heart-torso models derived from high-quality tomographic images of individual subjects. However, anatomical modeling involves variations that lead to unresolved uncertainties in the outcome of EP imaging, bringing questions to the robustness of these methods in clinical practice. In this study, we design a systematic statistical approach to assess the sensitivity of EP imaging methods to the variations in personalized anatomical modeling. Methods: We first quantify the variations in personalized anatomical models by a novel application of statistical shape modeling. Given the statistical distribution of the variation in personalized anatomical models, we then employ unscented transform to determine the sensitivity of EP imaging outputs to the variation in input personalized anatomical modeling. Results: We test the feasibility of our proposed approach using two of the existing EP imaging methods: epicardial-based electrocardiographic imaging and transmural electrophysiological imaging. Both phantom and real-data experiments show that variations in personalized anatomical models have negligible impact on the outcome of EP imaging. Conclusion: This study verifies the robustness of EP imaging methods to the errors in personalized anatomical modeling and suggests the possibility to simplify the process of anatomical modeling in future clinical practice. Significance: This study proposes a systematic statistical approach to quantify anatomical modeling variations and assess their impact on EP imaging, which can be extended to find a balance between the quality of personalized anatomical models and the accuracy of EP imaging that may improve the clinical feasibility of EP imaging.
  • Keywords
    bioelectric phenomena; computerised tomography; electrocardiography; geometry; image reconstruction; medical image processing; phantoms; physiological models; sensitivity analysis; statistical distributions; transforms; EP imaging accuracy; EP imaging feasibility; EP imaging outcome uncertainty; EP imaging output sensitivity; EP imaging robustness; anatomical modeling simplification; anatomically-detailed heart-torso model; clinical feasibility; clinical practice; epicardial-based electrocardiographic imaging; high-quality tomographic image; input personalized anatomical modeling variation; noninvasive cardiac EP imaging; noninvasive cardiac electrophysiological imaging sensitivity; personalized anatomical model quality; personalized anatomical model variation quantification; personalized anatomical modeling error; phantom experiment; real-data experiment; statistical distribution; statistical shape modeling; systematic statistical method; transmural electrophysiological imaging; unscented transform; Biological system modeling; Heart; Imaging; Mathematical model; Sensitivity; Shape; Uncertainty; Noninvasive cardiac electrophysiological imaging; noninvasive cardiac electrophysiological imaging; personalized anatomical modeling; sensitivity study; statistical shape modeling; unscented transform;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0018-9294
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TBME.2015.2395387
  • Filename
    7017549