Title :
Comparison of the current methods for coverage area prediction for communication in the HF band
Author :
Tanyer, S.G. ; Erol, C.B.
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Electr. Electron. Eng., Baskent Univ., Ankara, Turkey
Abstract :
A comparative study of the commonly used methods for the prediction of the coverage area due to a transmitter operating at the HF hand is presented. Those statistical model-based tools are Ionospheric Communication analysis and Prediction Program; IONCAP, Ionospheric Communication Enhanced Profile Analysis and Circuit Prediction Program; ICEPAC, Voice of America´s VOACAP and ITU´s REC 533, and those are illustrated by computing the coverage area of a typical transmitter located at Oxford, England operating at 13.399 MHz (HF band I). Those results are compared with the experimental data measured at Istanbul, Turkey for a transmitter located at Oxford, England. Finally, the same problem is analyzed by the ray-tracing technique using the experimental data. The advantages and the disadvantages of the methods are discussed.
Keywords :
HF radio propagation; ionospheric electromagnetic wave propagation; radio transmitters; ray tracing; 13.399 MHz; HF band communication; ICEPAC; IONCAP; ITUs REC 533; Ionospheric Communication analysis and Prediction Program; Istanbul; Oxford; Turkey; VOACAP; Voice of America; coverage area prediction; ray-tracing technique; statistical model-based tools; transmitter; Attenuation; Circuit analysis; Frequency; Ionosphere; Noise level; Predictive models; Radio transmitters; Ray tracing; Satellite broadcasting; Speech analysis;
Conference_Titel :
Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, 1998. IEEE
Conference_Location :
Atlanta, GA, USA
Print_ISBN :
0-7803-4478-2
DOI :
10.1109/APS.1998.701572