• DocumentCode
    3229489
  • Title

    Automated transducer testing and calibration with a dynamic phantom

  • Author

    Valante, A.A. ; Riedel, Frank ; Corner, G.A. ; Joy, Joshua ; Cochran, Sandy

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Phys., Univ. of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, UK
  • fYear
    2011
  • fDate
    18-21 Oct. 2011
  • Firstpage
    2325
  • Lastpage
    2328
  • Abstract
    Variation in transducer array performance for biomedical imaging and non-destructive testing (NDT) is inherent in manufacturing, and performance degradation also occurs when the devices are in service. It is already straightforward to determine basic device functionality through transmit and receive sensitivity measurements and from electrical impedance. However, this requires special equipment and procedures likely to be inaccessible to end users. Nevertheless, validation of transducer performance is of increasing importance as the use of array systems grows for NDT and for medical diagnosis and treatment management by non-specialist users. Our objective here was to produce an automated system for array validation through calculation of the resolution integral (RI). The dynamic phantom that has been developed is based on imaging two filamentary targets positioned in a tank of liquid tissue-mimicking material under computer control. The mechanism for this is reliable and inexpensive, with the filaments coupled magnetically through the tank wall. Images are captured and analysed to assess targets resolution in an automated feedback loop. The new phantom has been tested on a total of 18 imaging systems in clinical use. Results were repeatable and consistent when compared with those produced with more conventional techniques. Furthermore, RI calculation successfully differentiated recent, high quality scanners from others and also differentiated linear flat and convex probes and phased arrays. The dynamic phantom thus offers assessment of ultrasound imaging systems quantitatively for purchasing decisions, delivery acceptance and on-going quality assessment. With further work, it will be developed to test systems rigorously and to benchmark them for comparison and prior to introduction to service.
  • Keywords
    biomedical ultrasonics; calibration; phantoms; ultrasonic imaging; ultrasonic transducer arrays; automated transducer testing; biomedical imaging; calibration; device functionality; dynamic phantom; electrical impedance; filamentary target; liquid tissue mimicking material; medical diagnosis; nondestructive testing; performance degradation; receive sensitivity measurement; resolution integral; targets resolution; transducer array performance; transmit sensitivity measurement; treatment management; ultrasound imaging system; Arrays; Image resolution; Phantoms; Transducers; Ultrasonic imaging; resolution integral; ultrasound phantom; ultrasound system evaluation;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), 2011 IEEE International
  • Conference_Location
    Orlando, FL
  • ISSN
    1948-5719
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4577-1253-1
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ULTSYM.2011.0577
  • Filename
    6293385