DocumentCode
335501
Title
Implementation and prevention of unstable optimal compensators
Author
MacMartin, Douglas G. ; How, Jonathan P.
Author_Institution
Inst. for Aerosp. Res., Nat. Res. Council of Canada, Canada
Volume
2
fYear
1994
fDate
29 June-1 July 1994
Firstpage
2190
Abstract
Optimal control design methods frequently lead to unstable compensators, even for stable plants. These compensators present possible implementation difficulties because they are conditionally stable. If unstable compensation is not inherently required for performance, then a stable compensator is preferable. The reasons why unstable compensators arise within the linear quadratic Gaussian framework are discussed. Examples and experimental results from the Middeck Active Control Experiment (MACE) are used to illustrate the implementation difficulties associated with unstable compensators. Several approaches to designing stable compensators are compared.
Keywords
compensation; control system synthesis; linear quadratic Gaussian control; stability; LQG control; MACE; Middeck Active Control Experiment; conditionally stable compensators; linear quadratic Gaussian framework; optimal control design methods; unstable optimal compensators; Actuators; Aerospace control; Councils; Degradation; Design methodology; Friction; Mathematical model; Optimal control; Robustness; Stability;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
American Control Conference, 1994
Print_ISBN
0-7803-1783-1
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/ACC.1994.752464
Filename
752464
Link To Document