Title :
Software engineering education should be presented as: A. Science B. Engineering C. Technology D. All of the above E. None of the above, other
Author :
Diaz-Herrera, Jorge L. ; Hilburn, Tom ; Hislop, Gregory ; Lutz, Michael ; MacNeil, Paul E. ; McCracken, Michael
Author_Institution :
Sch. of Comput. & Software Eng., Southern Polytech. State Univ., Marietta, GA, USA
fDate :
6/23/1905 12:00:00 AM
Abstract :
For many, the software engineering profession is still viewed as immature. The authors contend that a major problem has to do with the current educational model(s) for software. Most computer science graduates pursue careers in software development/software engineering. Only recently, a few B.S. in Software Engineering programs began their existence. Analyses of several of these programs reveal a lack of coherent design. Some are housed in an engineering school and have the \´flavor\´ of engineering but lack enough emphasis on software engineering core. Some are housed on traditional CS departments, have a strong CS component with a few SwE courses, and no engineering focus. What is the right "mix"? Which of the existing BSSwE programs can be accredited? What educational model will most likely help produce a professional software engineer? Science? Engineering? Technology? This paper addresses these and other related topics and controversial issues
Keywords :
accreditation; computer science education; educational courses; software engineering; teaching; accreditation; careers; computer science graduates; educational models; software engineering education courses; software engineering profession; Accreditation; Business; Computer science; Educational institutions; Educational programs; Educational technology; Engineering education; Engineering profession; Programming; Software engineering;
Conference_Titel :
Frontiers in Education Conference, 2001. 31st Annual
Print_ISBN :
0-7803-6669-7
DOI :
10.1109/FIE.2001.963916