• DocumentCode
    3602740
  • Title

    Ballistocardiogram as Proximal Timing Reference for Pulse Transit Time Measurement: Potential for Cuffless Blood Pressure Monitoring

  • Author

    Chang-Sei Kim ; Carek, Andrew M. ; Mukkamala, Ramakrishna ; Inan, Omer T. ; Jin-Oh Hahn

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Mech. Eng., Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
  • Volume
    62
  • Issue
    11
  • fYear
    2015
  • Firstpage
    2657
  • Lastpage
    2664
  • Abstract
    Goal: We tested the hypothesis that the ballistocardiogram (BCG) waveform could yield a viable proximal timing reference for measuring pulse transit time (PTT). Methods: From 15 healthy volunteers, we measured PTT as the time interval between BCG and a noninvasively measured finger blood pressure (BP) waveform. To evaluate the efficacy of the BCG-based PTT in estimating BP, we likewise measured pulse arrival time (PAT) using the electrocardiogram (ECG) as proximal timing reference and compared their correlations to BP. Results: BCG-based PTT was correlated with BP reasonably well: the mean correlation coefficient (r ) was 0.62 for diastolic (DP), 0.65 for mean (MP), and 0.66 for systolic (SP) pressures when the intersecting tangent method was used as distal timing reference. Comparing four distal timing references (intersecting tangent, maximum second derivative, diastolic minimum, and systolic maximum), PTT exhibited the best correlation with BP when the systolic maximum method was used (mean r value was 0.66 for DP, 0.67 for MP, and 0.70 for SP). PTT was more strongly correlated with DP than PAT regardless of the distal timing reference: mean r value was 0.62 versus 0.51 (p = 0.07) for intersecting tangent, 0.54 versus 0.49 (p = 0.17) for maximum second derivative, 0.58 versus 0.52 (p = 0.37) for diastolic minimum, and 0.66 versus 0.60 (p = 0.10) for systolic maximum methods. The difference between PTT and PAT in estimating DP was significant (p = 0.01) when the r values associated with all the distal timing references were compared altogether. However, PAT appeared to outperform PTT in estimating SP ( p = 0.31 when the r values associated with all the distal timing references were compared altogether). Conclusion: We conclude that BCG is an adequate proximal timing reference in deriving PTT, and that BCG-based PTT may be superior to ECG-based PAT in estimating DP. Significance: PTT with BCG as proximal timing reference has potential to enable convenient and ubiq- itous cuffless BP monitoring.
  • Keywords
    blood pressure measurement; electrocardiography; medical disorders; BCG-based PTT; ECG-based PAT; ballistocardiogram waveform; cuffless blood pressure monitoring; diastolic minimum; distal timing references; electrocardiogram; intersecting tangent method; mean correlation coefficient; noninvasively measured finger blood pressure waveform; proximal timing reference; pulse transit time measurement; systolic maximum method; ubiquitous cuffless BP monitoring; Biomedical monitoring; Correlation; Electrocardiography; Monitoring; Timing; Ballistocardiogram (BCG); Blood Pressure; Electrocardiogram (ECG); Pulse Arrival Time (PAT); Pulse Transit Time (PTT); blood pressure; electrocardiogram (ECG); pulse arrival time (PAT); pulse transit time (PTT);
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0018-9294
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TBME.2015.2440291
  • Filename
    7116556