• DocumentCode
    3680102
  • Title

    Comparative study of three-phase grid connected inverter sharing unbalanced three-phase and/or single-phase systems

  • Author

    Andrew Hintz;Rajagopal Prasanna;Kaushik Rajashekara

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Electrical Engineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA
  • fYear
    2015
  • Firstpage
    6491
  • Lastpage
    6496
  • Abstract
    In a microgrid system, unbalance in the three-phase system is created due to single-phase loads and decentralized single-phase renewable energy sources. This unbalance can be compensated locally at the point of common coupling (PCC) using a three-phase four-wire grid tied inverter. This paper focuses on a comparative study of 3-phase, 4-wire inverter topologies to compensate for positive, negative and zero sequence components of the current injected into the grid. The function of this inverter is to inject power to the grid and additional active power compensation (APC) to support unbalance, load reactive power, and load neutral current. Performance analysis and control of these topologies are being compared to evaluate utilization of dc link, size, control, and ease of implementation. A qualitative comparison of the topologies is provided to illustrate the advantages and disadvantages of the analyzed systems. Simulation and experimental results are presented to support the analysis of 3-phase, 480V, 50kVA system. The experimental results validate the ability of the inverter to provide 4-quadrant control of each phase independently.
  • Keywords
    "Inverters","Topology","Capacitors","Voltage control","Reactive power","Switches","Capacitance"
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), 2015 IEEE
  • ISSN
    2329-3721
  • Electronic_ISBN
    2329-3748
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ECCE.2015.7310569
  • Filename
    7310569